CO129-292 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [6-8] — Page 633

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

630

It is by the test of these instructions that I,

and I believe all other Consuls in China, decide as to what

British Subjects of Chinese blood are entitled to protection

in China, and not, as alleged in the petition, on the question

of dress, as laid down in Sir Rutherford Alcock's Circular of

October 7th, 1868. I take leave to doubt that for many years

at any rate there has been a single refusal to recognise a

British Colonial born Chinese on the ground that he did not

wear a distinctive dress. I believe I am therefore right in

stating that Sir Rutherford Alcock's Circular, though it has

never been actually withdrawn, has been virtually a dead

letter.

A certificate, such as is annexed to the petition, would confer on its holder a right to be treated as a

British Subject in any other country except that of his origin. I believe that it is an axiom that no person can have a

double nationality, and also that where a person of one nationality is born on foreign territory he has the option as to

which country he will elect to belong. Should he elect the

Country of his birth, and not that of his parents he must

throw off the allegiance to the Sovereign of the latter. In

China no law exists allowing him to do this. The abnormal

position

Edit History

2026-05-31 06:09:12 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
630 It is by the test of these instructions that I, and I believe all other Consuls in China, decide as to what British Subjects of Chinese blood are entitled to protection in China, and not, as alleged in the petition, on the question of dress, as laid down in Sir Rutherford Alcock's Circular of October 7th, 1868. I take leave to doubt that for many years at any rate there has been a single refusal to recognise a British Colonial born Chinese on the ground that he did not wear a distinctive dress. I believe I am therefore right in stating that Sir Rutherford Alcock's Circular, though it has never been actually withdrawn, has been virtually a dead letter. A certificate, such as is annexed to the petition, would confer on its holder a right to be treated as a British Subject in any other country except that of his origin. I believe that it is an axiom that no person can have a double nationality, and also that where a person of one nationality is born on foreign territory he has the option as to which country he will elect to belong. Should he elect the Country of his birth, and not that of his parents he must throw off the allegiance to the Sovereign of the latter. In China no law exists allowing him to do this. The abnormal position
Baseline (Original)
630 It is by the test of these instructions that I, and I believe all other Consuls in China, decide as to what British Subjects of Chinese blood are entitled to protection in China, and not, as alleged in the petition, on the question of dress, as laid down in Sir Rutherford Alcock's Circular of October 7th, 1868. I take leave to doubt that for many years at any rate there has been a single refusal to recognise a British Colonial born Chinese on the ground that he did not wear a distinctive dress. I believe I am therefore right in stating that Sir Rutherford Alcock's Circular, though it has never been actually withdrawn, has been virtually a dead letter. A certificate, such as is annexed to the peti- tion, would confer on its holder a right to be treated as a British Subject in any other country except that of his ori- gin. I believe that it is an axion that no person can have a double nationality, and also that where a person of one nationa- lity is born on foreign territory he has the option as to which country he will elect to belong. Should he elect the Country of his birth, and not that of his parents he must throw off the allegiance to the Sovereign of the latter. In China no law exists allowing him to do this. The abnormal position
2026-05-31 06:09:12 · Baseline
View content

630

It is by the test of these instructions that I,

and I believe all other Consuls in China, decide as to what

British Subjects of Chinese blood are entitled to protection

in China, and not, as alleged in the petition, on the question

of dress, as laid down in Sir Rutherford Alcock's Circular of

October 7th, 1868. I take leave to doubt that for many years

at any rate there has been a single refusal to recognise a

British Colonial born Chinese on the ground that he did not

wear a distinctive dress. I believe I am therefore right in

stating that Sir Rutherford Alcock's Circular, though it has

never been actually withdrawn, has been virtually a dead

letter.

A certificate, such as is annexed to the peti-

tion, would confer on its holder a right to be treated as a

British Subject in any other country except that of his ori-

gin. I believe that it is an axion that no person can have a

double nationality, and also that where a person of one nationa-

lity is born on foreign territory he has the option as to

which country he will elect to belong. Should he elect the

Country of his birth, and not that of his parents he must

throw off the allegiance to the Sovereign of the latter. In

China no law exists allowing him to do this. The abnormal

position

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.